
Innovation thesis and innovation portfolio- lessons from VC and Mckinsey
In the article “The raise of ambidextrous organizations as a corporate strategy to cope with disruption”, we discussed the introduction of a dual innovation system to improve the ability corporates in coping with disruption.
In the article “The raise of ambidextrous organizations as a corporate strategy to cope with disruption”, we discussed the introduction of a dual innovation system to improve the ability corporates in coping with disruption.
The beauty of the system is its ability to serve as a plug-in with the current business structure by introducing an exploratory unit at the support of the exploitation unit.
The exploitation unit stands for the core company, which is responsible for optimizing the business and innovating it by applying incremental innovation.
The exploratory unit stands for the people looking to challenge the core products and business model of the company, with the goal of recognizing opportunities, test them, and convert them into new products and alliances. A different management process must be applied for testing opportunities and allocate capital.
The exploitation and exploratory units are independent, and both refer to the board.
How can the board align its objective and split tasks and resources to the two units?
The exploitation unit of a corporation with billions of revenue rarely has a strategic interest in emerging trends. Emerging trends cannot solve the growth needs of large corporates simply because they don’t have enough revenue potential yet. Nevertheless, they might become important after 3-5 years down the road.
The exploratory unit steps in with the responsibility of testing the market opportunities and build new products in emerging trends. In case of success, the products are integrated back to the core unit when the market is mature enough. The proposed approach solves the problem of being suddenly disrupted by new startups because of the negligence of emerging techs.
In order to have the two units work smoothly, the boarding has to define the objectives for the exploratory unit. For this task, it comes handy the innovation thesis usually used by venture capitalists, which is their point of view of how the world is going to change in the next 5-10 years. This statement is supported by hypotheses about how startups can take advantage of new trends.
Innovation thesis is compelling because it allows innovation managers to prioritize which trends to look at, which innovation concept to experiment, and which ones to neglect.
A balanced innovation portfolio
Because we cannot predict the future, the innovation thesis must be developed and viewed as a hypothesis that will evolve over time. The investments in various ideas will be the experiments for testing and update the thesis. On a quarterly or biannual basis, leaders can gather together to review the progress and refine the innovation thesis.
There are numerous frameworks used to develop an innovation portfolio of products. My favorite one is the framework developed by Mckinsey and featured in the book Alchemy of growth. This framework supports companies in managing their future growth without hurting current profitability.
The Mckinsey framework states that for a company to achieve consistent levels of growth, they must invest in its core products as well the products with the potential to become the next cash-cows.

Horizon one (H1) is associated with the core business of the company. In H1, the company is focused on improving performance and maximizing financial metrics.
Horizon two (H2) represents emerging technologies and trends which are likely to generate sustainable profit in 3-5 years.
Horizon three ( H3) represents ground-breaking innovation. These are bets on the future, which have the potential to transform the company and its industry, and they have a high intrinsic risk of failure.
A Harvard study made by Nagji and Tuff, concluded that firms that allocated in average 70% of their innovation funds to incremental innovations (H1), 20% to emerging trends (H2), and 10% to breakthrough high-risk initiatives outperformed their peers. In fact, they have realized a P/E premium of 10% to 20%.

Case in point: Google’s co-founder Larry Page told Fortune magazine that the company strives for a 70-20-10 balance, and he credited the 10% of resources that are dedicated to breakthrough efforts with all the company’s truly new offerings
The 70-20-10 is an attractive rule, but it needs changes based on the analyzed industry. Nagji and Tuff proposed an 80-18-2 ration for Consumer goods companies (low tech), whereas mid-stage tech firms should have ratio closed to 45-40-15.
As proven by Harvard professors Nagji and Tuff, a balanced portfolio is necessary to move towards competitive advantage over time.
We love to share
our experiences
Understanding your own technology portfolio and how it blends into the technology landscape of both known rivals and potential partners is a vital component of any innovation management program
New sample video post two
New sample video post twoNew sample video post twoNew sample video post twoNew sample video post twoNew sample video post twoNew sample video post twoNew sample video post two
New sample video post one
New sample video post oneNew sample video post oneNew sample video post oneNew sample video post oneNew sample video post oneNew sample video post oneNew sample video post oneNew sample video post one
In the article “The raise of ambidextrous organizations as a corporate strategy to cope with disruption”, we discussed the introduction of a dual innovation system to improve the ability corporates in coping with disruption.
The average age of an S&P 500 company has substantially decreased in the last decades, and it is now estimated to be 20 years. At the current churn rate, half of the S&P 500 will be replaced in the next ten years
It is the dream of every team leader or project manager to be supported by a team which performances and productivity are constantly beyond expectations and higher than the set KPIs.
15 Best Blogs To Follow About Web Design
Iure architecto repudiandae sit similique et. Ex qui beatae quis recusandae alias consequatur. Qui quam ut beatae. Soluta itaque tempora voluptates asperiores sapiente voluptate nam aliquam rerum. Provident quaerat blanditiis possimus sed harum quia. Et velit eos voluptas molestias non p
14 Common Misconceptions About Web Design
Molestias tempora et mollitia dolorem dolores assumenda placeat. Sit reprehenderit corrupti quaerat voluptatem et inventore ea ut porro. Eaque ut praesentium perferendis et impedit quasi porro. Voluptas aut omnis itaque